Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South El Monte council delays decision on cannabis buffer-zone maps after heated public comments
Summary
The South El Monte City Council pulled a proposed update to its cannabis buffer-zone maps to a "date uncertain" after extended public comment urging preservation of a 1,000-foot school buffer and staff requests for more time to finalize maps.
The South El Monte City Council on Tuesday temporarily removed a zoning item about cannabis buffer zones from the agenda and asked staff for more time to produce updated buffer maps after a lengthy public-comment period in which residents urged the council to keep a 1,000-foot buffer between dispensaries and places where children gather.
The council, led by Mayor Gloria Olmos and Mayor Pro Tem Hector Delgado, approved an amended agenda that moved a separate town-hall item up and pulled agenda item 9A — the staff update on cannabis buffer-zone maps — to a "date uncertain" while staff completes updated buffer-zone maps, engineering overlays and related analysis.
The move came after more than two dozen members of the public addressed the council on the subject. Many speakers urged the council not to reduce the city's current 1,000-foot buffer between dispensaries and schools, day-care centers and parks. Rebecca Diaz, who identified herself as a music-therapy clinician, told the council: "I urge you to protect the thousand foot buffer. I urge you to pause on expansion until we have a comprehensive plan that includes youth protections, mental-health considerations and community input." Other speakers, including school officials and parents, similarly raised concerns about youth exposure and enforcement capacity.
Council members and staff said the item required additional technical work. City staff and the city engineer told the council they were preparing updated buffer-zone maps showing how proposed buffers would interact with existing zoning and land uses. At the meeting the city manager said staff recommended more time to produce a complete set of mapping options for council consideration.
No ordinance or ordinance amendment was introduced or adopted at the meeting. The only formal action on the subject was the council's vote to remove the item from the printed agenda and return it at an unspecified future date after staff completes the mapping work. Mayor Olmos acknowledged the public concern and told residents the council would "stand by" the process as staff completes the requested mapping.
Why it matters: Buffer-zone distances determine where storefront cannabis businesses can locate; changes to those distances can materially affect which commercial properties are eligible and where dispensaries may appear. Residents and school officials told the council they view proximity to schools and parks as a public-health and youth-safety issue and asked for more public engagement before any change.
What happened next: Staff told the council it will produce updated buffer-zone maps and related analysis; a new hearing or council meeting item was not scheduled at the meeting. The public-comment record will be part of the file when the item returns to the council.
