LPC approves window changes for Orchard Beach Pavilion as restoration continues

5705111 · August 13, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Landmarks Preservation Commission approved an amendment to an earlier binding report allowing new fixed and awning windows on the north wing of the Orchard Beach Pavilion in the Bronx, citing the facade's subordinate visibility and the project's restoration funding and schedule.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission on Aug. 12 approved an amendment to an earlier binding report that allows replacement windows on the north wing of the Orchard Beach Pavilion (LPC docket LPC-25-09964), a city landmark in Pelham Bay Park. The vote was unanimous. Deputy director for preservation Caroline Kane Levy and the project team said the pavilion restoration — carried out for the Department of Parks in collaboration with the Economic Development Corporation and preservation conservators — is in active construction and includes major structural and material repairs. The current request covered the pavilion’s land‑side north wing, a facade the applicants described as subordinate in visibility and used primarily for service and concessions access. Contractors had included fixed aluminum windows in their bids and said changes now would add cost and delay to a project that already faces significant unforeseen conditions. Marvel architect Martha Bush explained the proposed windows retain the original multi‑light configuration but would use an aluminum system with the upper casement sections fixed and lower lights as awning windows for weather protection rather than operable casements. Staff said the fixed sections would allow slimmer sightlines that better match the historic profiles than the existing deteriorated casements and that a hopper (operable) on the bottom would remain operable for ventilation. Commission discussions focused on visibility, material finish and whether the south wing — not in this phase of work — should be brought in for future matching work. Commissioners praised the overall restoration progress and the large‑scale scope of the project. The commission’s preservation staff recommended issuance of a favorable report noting: the windows are on a side facade with limited public visibility; the proposed replacement matches historic configuration; fixed casements allow closer replication of thin historic profiles; and the change would not detract from the landmark’s character. The motion to issue a favorable binding report passed 10–0. Vice Chair Master and several commissioners commended the parks department and the contractor team for the work already completed — new concrete columns, ramps and terracotta repairs — and urged the applicant to return with matching treatments for the south wing when funding allows.