Meeting participants approved a project tied to a proposed master signage plan after brief discussion and a motion to approve "the project as presented this evening." Speaker 2, a meeting participant, asked procedurally, "what are the next steps? Next I could make a motion to approve the project as presented this evening." Speaker 2 then indicated a second was obtained and participants recorded "aye" on a voice vote.

The discussion addressed signage guidelines and how tenants would be covered by a master signage plan. Speaker 1, a meeting participant, said, "Something of this magnitude that there is a master signage plan, and the tenants there are fall with under that umbrella once you decide." Speaker 2 also said, "I think there should be various guidelines. I think you guys have started in the right direction in my opinion. I I think it's classic and simple. Fair enough."

No ordinance, statute, permit numbers, or departmental directives were referenced in the transcript. Participants repeatedly noted that the comments made during the discussion "will be taken into consideration," but the transcript does not record staff direction to prepare revised materials or a formal adoption of a signage code. The only formal action recorded in the transcript was a motion to approve the project as presented; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote with multiple "aye" responses. The transcript does not supply the names of the mover or seconder, nor an exact vote tally.

After the approval, routine meeting business continued and the meeting was later adjourned. The record does not identify specific next steps for implementation, any schedule for adopting a formal master signage plan, or whether tenants will receive formal notice of sign guidelines.