Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Motor Vehicle Mou topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pondera County approves MOU with state motor vehicle division; county to provide hardware for licensing services
Summary
The commission approved a memorandum of understanding with the Department of Justice Motor Vehicle Division and the treasurer's office that will require the county to supply hardware for vehicle and vessel licensing after the state reduces its equipment support; officials discussed unclear costs and operational impacts.
Get email alerts on the Motor Vehicle Mou topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pondera County commissioners voted May 28 to enter a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Department of Justice Motor Vehicle Division and the county treasurer's office under which the county would supply hardware needed for licensing services once the state reduces direct equipment support.
The MOU covers licensing and registration for vehicles, trailers, semitrailers, campers, motorboats, personal watercraft, sailboats, snowmobiles and off-highway vehicles. County officials said the state would no longer provide the county's share of equipment and asked counties to supply hardware such as computers, printers and scanners.
During discussion officials said no firm dollar amount had been provided. A county staff member named Shauna said the county's immediate need would likely be three computers; other participants noted the potential need for printers or scanners. Commissioners discussed related costs already borne by counties, including payment for birth and death certificate paper and the county's historical role providing space but not full salary funding for the county attorney or other court equipment.
One commissioner said the county could raise the concern with a regional group (named in the meeting as "Mako"). After discussion a motion to enter the MOU was made, seconded and approved by voice vote.
The transcript records county concern about uncertain out-of-pocket costs and a note that if counties decline to provide equipment, county residents could face service disruptions. No specific contract cost or implementation timetable was provided in the meeting.

