Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Rules topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council considers updates to rules and norms including public‑comment limits and closed‑session practice

5685819 · August 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented proposed edits to the council’s rules and norms clarifying public‑comment media restrictions, social‑media guidance for use of employee images, and the ability to call closed sessions from work sessions.

City staff briefed the Ogden City Council on a package of proposed amendments to the council’s rules and norms document that would clarify public‑comment procedures, social‑media use, and the process for entering closed session from work sessions.

Steve Burton, presenting the changes, said the rules and norms document provides a framework for how the council conducts business and that the draft updates reflect council guidance from an April strategy session and a July work session. The proposed edits include a clarification that the meeting chair may adjust public‑comment time limits to help manage long agendas; a prohibition on audiovisual materials such as videos or PowerPoints during public comment; new language advising council members to avoid using images of on‑duty city employees in campaign materials; and a clarification that the council may enter a closed (executive) session during a public work session when legally appropriate.

During the discussion council members voiced two recurring concerns: the desire to preserve meaningful opportunities for public comment and the need for clear, consistent guidance when the chair adjusts time limits. Multiple council members emphasized that the public‑comment provision is intended as a tool to manage exceptionally long agendas, not to reduce regular public access. Several members suggested the rules document is a “living” document that can be revised again and that operational details (such as how often semiannual reports are required) could be refined in future drafts.

Members of the public who spoke during the meeting urged caution on changing public‑comment protections. Laura Lewis, a 73‑year Ogden resident, told the council she felt reductions to speaking time would be unfair and urged consistent guidelines so residents do not lose the opportunity to speak before the full council. Heath Sotto, a resident who joined by Zoom, asked the council to “preserve more transparency and strengthen, not weaken, the role of advisory bodies and ensure that the council retains meaningful oversight.”

Council members did not adopt a final amendment package at this meeting; staff said the document has been updated regularly and that further edits can be made after additional feedback and legal review.