Resident safety expert questions street widths and new fire-truck need, warns wider streets encourage speeding
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
A resident and safety engineer told the council that wide local streets — designed to accommodate large fire apparatus — encourage speeding and have contributed to pedestrian deaths; he urged the city to reconsider purchasing a larger fire truck and to explore alternatives.
A resident who identified himself as a safety engineer for the Air Force told the council on July 8 that Layton’s wide streets contribute to speeding and pedestrian deaths and criticized a proposal discussed in a prior session to acquire a large fire truck.
Michael Christiansen cited multiple local traffic fatalities and near-fatalities involving children and a crossing guard and argued that wide roadway designs (he cited examples of 59-foot and 59-foot widths on local roads) make it easy to speed. He said city requirements that streets accommodate a 40-foot fire truck are a primary reason for wide streets and that those regulations create “a system of perverse incentives” that produce hazards requiring larger emergency apparatus.
Christiansen recommended the city seek a truck with a shorter ladder (he suggested a 70-foot ladder instead of a longer 107-foot ladder cited in staff discussions) and questioned whether larger trucks materially improve response to the types of buildings most likely to present ladder needs.
His remarks were part of citizen comment; no staff response or council action was recorded at the meeting. The comment raised a public-safety framing that several council members later referenced when discussing design and code issues for infill and street setbacks.
