Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Event Venue topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners deny rezoning request for historic Benson house; owner says goal is preservation
Summary
A proposal to rezone the Benson family home site on South Benson to commercial (C‑2) for use as an event center drew opposition from nearby landowners and was denied by the commission; the property owner said the intent is to preserve the house and use it for small events and school visits.
McALLEN, Texas — The City Commission voted Monday to deny a request to rezone the Lloyd Benson family home site near 3000 South Benson from single‑family (R‑1) to commercial (C‑2). Property owners and developers told the commission they bought surrounding acreage with an expectation of residential development; nearby neighbors opposed introducing commercial uses citing noise and drainage concerns.
Jesse Barber, representing the surrounding owners, told commissioners the parcel historically was part of the Benson estate and that surrounding acreage is being developed as residential lots. “We believe as we bought for purposes of the purchase, this area was for residential community,” Barber said, arguing a commercial carve‑out would not fit the larger scheme.
The applicant, who identified himself as the current owner of the Benson house, said he wants to preserve the 1952 house and use it for small events, school visits and to display Benson family memorabilia. “What I want to do is preserve the house … I think it’s a historical House Of McAllen,” the owner said, adding his preferred model was a modest event use rather than a nightclub or large commercial venue.
Neighbors and at least one resident who said he had heard amplified music from an earlier event objected, citing noise and potential parking and drainage impacts. Commissioner discussion focused on how a rezoning differs from a conditional use permit or a planned unit development (PUD) and whether protections to limit outdoor amplified music or to guarantee a specific use could be attached; staff noted noise limits and CUP conditions are considered at later permit stages, not in a straight rezoning.
After debate, commissioners voted to deny the rezoning. Several commissioners encouraged the owner to pursue alternatives — such as a PUD, a conditional use permit under an appropriate zoning district, or local historic designation — to preserve the house while addressing neighbors’ concerns. Commissioners also noted denying an unconstrained rezoning can be used to prevent unplanned commercial conversion that could later be redeveloped with uses inconsistent with the house’s preservation.
What’s next: The owner may pursue a different zoning path (PUD, CUP) or a historic designation to protect the house while advancing a preservation plan.
