Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board lowers waterfront parcel value after owners cite limited access, weeds and weak offers

August 07, 2025 | Okanogan County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board lowers waterfront parcel value after owners cite limited access, weeds and weak offers
The Okanogan County Board of Equalization on Wednesday reduced the assessed value of a small waterfront parcel after the owners argued the lot’s irregular pie‑shape, restricted access and heavy aquatic vegetation in the adjacent bay limit marketability and therefore fair market value.

Appellants Wade (or Wayne) Paul and co‑owner described the parcel as a 0.64‑acre, pie‑shaped waterfront lot accessed only by an easement between neighbors and largely obscured from the road by a neighboring garage. The owner also told the board the bay in front of the parcel is heavily infested with pondweed and tules and that treatment options had been limited historically because of proximity to the Canadian border.

Owners said the parcel has been listed for four years and produced one offer of $380,000; they asked the board to set a market value of $425,000. Assessor staff pointed to recent waterfront sales on similar parts of the lake and explained that the county’s waterfront model relied principally on front‑foot value; assessor comparables generally showed higher front‑foot prices than the appellant’s parcel.

After discussion the board concluded the parcel’s combination of restricted access, limited usable buildable envelope (floodplain and easements) and the waterfront bay’s vegetation justified a lower valuation than the assessor had placed on the record. The board set a new land value of $435,000, with improvements of $5,000, producing a combined assessed value of $440,000 for parcel 4780010000. The board said it would mail a written decision within 45 days.

The board’s decision did not prohibit the owners from attempting to sell at higher asking prices; rather, it adjusted the assessed taxable value to better reflect the board’s finding about marketability given access, shape and waterfront conditions.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI