Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bylaws Secretary Roberts Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission moves secretary language to clarify that planning department provides secretarial services; adopts Robert's Rules (12th ed.)
Summary
Members voted to relocate and amend a bylaw provision so the planning department will provide secretary services to the Program Planning Commission and adopted the 12th edition of Robert's Rules of Order for meeting procedure.
Members of the Program Planning Commission voted during their meeting to move the bylaw language that requires the commission to “appoint a secretary” into Article 4 and to add an explicit sentence that the planning department will provide secretarial services to the commission.
The change, proposed as an edit to the commission bylaws, was aimed at aligning the text with current practice and a cited Revised Code of Washington (RCW) provision. The commission also voted to add a sentence under Article 6 adopting Robert’s Rules of Order, 12th edition, for meeting conduct.
Commissioners said the existing bylaw language — “the commission shall appoint a secretary” — reflects an older statutory phrasing and does not match how the commission currently operates. A planning department staff member identified in the discussion as “Maddie” was described as performing secretary duties in practice. One member suggested changing the word “shall” to “may” to create flexibility; others proposed moving the secretary sentence under Article 4 and adding a clarifying sentence that the planning department will provide secretary services.
A motion to move the secretary bullet and add the sentence that the planning department will provide secretarial services was made and seconded; the chair called for a voice vote and the motion passed. The commission later moved to add a sentence under Article 6 stating “The planning commission will follow Robert’s Rules of Order, 12th edition.” That motion was also approved by voice vote.
Why it matters: the edit formalizes a long-standing practice so the bylaws reflect who actually prepares and keeps meeting records and offers a clearer record for administrative and public purposes.
Discussion versus action: commissioners explicitly described the change as an edit to the bylaws rather than a new policy. The votes recorded in the meeting were voice votes that passed; no roll-call tally was provided in the transcript.
Quotes from the meeting included practical wording suggestions and an explicit phrasing for the Robert’s Rules change: “The planning commission will follow Robert’s rules of order 12 edition.”
The commission directed staff to prepare the amended bylaws for a future meeting so members could review the exact language on paper before final adoption.
