Ad hoc to draft public-art review process; staff to convene meeting and research models

5677445 · August 18, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members agreed to form a Public Art Review Process ad hoc, to research other counties’ review processes and draft a recommended approval pathway; staff will coordinate the first meeting and gather sample processes prepared during prior planning work.

Members of the Creative Placemaking Strategy Advisory Committee discussed next steps for a Public Art Review Process ad hoc committee and agreed staff will convene the group to develop a recommended review process. Committee members said the ad hoc has not yet met and that existing materials (grant-review processes and planning-stage templates) could provide starting points. A presenter noted prior planning consultants had drafted a sample review process during the creative placemaking strategy work and that staff would look for those materials in county files. The nut graf: Committee direction was procedural — research existing review processes, convene the ad hoc with the named volunteers, and prepare a draft process for the advisory committee to review at a future meeting. Committee members asked staff to coordinate a meeting of ad hoc volunteers (listed in the minutes) and to gather examples from other jurisdictions and from the project’s planning-phase appendices. Members offered to help collect examples from arts councils in other counties and states. Ending: Hannah Harrison (staff) will send an email to set the meeting and distribute background materials so the ad hoc can draft a review and approval process for public art and bring that draft back to the advisory committee.