Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Arizona law changes require Kingman to move subdivision reviews to administrative process by year‑end; staff to draft ordinances
Summary
Staff explained that Arizona House Bill 24‑47 changes state law to require cities to allow administrative approval of site plans and plats; Kingman staff will draft updated zoning and subdivision ordinances and consider an expedited permit process but do not recommend adopting a private self‑certification program.
City planning staff briefed the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 11 about Arizona House Bill 24‑47 and what it will require of Kingman: by the end of 2025 the city must adopt administrative review processes for site plans and for preliminary and final plats that previously could require public hearings.
The change matters because it replaces an option the city formerly had to decide whether to permit administrative approvals; House Bill 24‑47 converts that option into a statutory requirement and will shorten applicant timelines while shifting some review away from public hearings.
“Back in 2023, the Arizona legislature adopted Senate Bridal 11 0 0 3,” Jason (planning staff) said during the briefing. He said the earlier law had offered local jurisdictions the option to allow administrative review; the governor signed House Bill 24‑47 on March 31, and the new law changes the earlier option into a “shall” — a mandatory duty for cities. Jason said the law requires local jurisdictions to adopt implementing ordinances and processes by December 31 of this year.
Staff described the specific effects: site plans, development plans and preliminary and final plats must be processed administratively rather than requiring automatic public hearings before the planning and zoning commission or council. The law also continues to allow local authorization of personnel to review design review plans, at‑risk submittals, and expedited permit review for applicants who meet objective standards. Jason said city staff will prepare ordinance language, define objective standards and eligibility rules for expedited review, and present the measures to council for adoption.
Jason told the commission that staff is not recommending adoption of the law’s self‑certification option, which would allow registered architects or engineers to self‑certify plans as meeting city standards and proceed directly to construction. “Staff is not recommending that the city adopt this particular option,” Jason said, adding that the city prefers to retain internal review and control to ensure compliance with adopted codes.
Jason said the change will shorten an applicant’s calendar timeline by about 45 days compared with the public‑hearing path and that other Arizona cities — Goodyear, Phoenix and Surprise — had already adopted administrative review when it was optional. He added staff will pursue an outreach workshop in July to inform the development community about upcoming procedural changes and will work with GIS and the permitting system to improve public visibility of ongoing projects.
Commissioners asked whether the change will increase staff workload. Jason replied that the net workload is not expected to increase substantially because some administrative tasks replace the public‑hearing preparation work, but staff will return with proposed ordinance language and implementation steps. No formal action was taken; the item was information only.
