Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pedestrian Safety Crosswalks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council Discusses Crosswalk Request on East Elm Near Watsonbrook Preschool; DOT Involvement Likely

5673505 · August 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents requested a mid-block crosswalk on East Elm between Watsonbrook Preschool and the elementary school. Council discussed signage standards, potential flashing lights and the need to consult the state Department of Transportation for anything on Highway 46.

The Beresford City Council discussed a request to place a crosswalk on East Elm between Watsonbrook Preschool and the elementary school and asked staff to consult traffic engineers and state officials about feasibility and cost. Council members said the request aims to improve safety for children and parents who park near the school.

Why it matters: A marked crosswalk and associated signage or flashing beacons could reduce conflicts between drivers and pedestrians at a location used by children but also requires compliance with national standards and, if near a state highway, coordination with the South Dakota Department of Transportation.

Discussion highlights: A council member who had spoken with Pat Carey relayed that a compliant installation may require more than paint, noting signage, potential flashing lights and placement to satisfy national standards for mid-block crossings. The council discussed alternatives including solar-operated push-button lights, hiring an engineering firm (the council mentioned the cost of drawing plans and possible traffic counts) and whether the city or the school district would contribute to costs. One member noted that if a crosswalk is placed mid-block, drivers do not always expect pedestrians, increasing the importance of signage and active warning devices.

The council also noted that portions of U.S. Highway 46 are controlled by the state and that any crossing or device along that corridor would require DOT review and likely traffic studies.

Action and next steps: Council asked staff to: (1) contact the DOT area engineer to understand the process for crossings on Highway 46; (2) ask an engineering partner for a rough cost estimate and potential design for the East Elm location; and (3) determine whether the school district would contribute. No formal vote was taken.

Ending: The council instructed staff to return with cost estimates and DOT feedback for further consideration.