Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board grants variance to allow porch replacement on legal nonconforming duplex

June 26, 2025 | City of Watertown, Codington County, South Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board grants variance to allow porch replacement on legal nonconforming duplex
The Watertown Board of Adjustment on June 26 granted a variance to allow replacement of an existing front porch on a duplex located at the properties described in the hearing (addresses noted as 212 Seventh Avenue Northeast and 621 Third Street Northeast). Planning staff told the board the structure is a legal nonconforming building and that the porch is within the front-yard setback.

Planning staff member Brandy explained why the item required a variance: the property predates current zoning and the proposed porch replacement includes structural and porch elements that go beyond a simple stoop, so the replacement constitutes an encroachment that cannot be approved administratively. "This is really, the existing structure... and this is... why it's before you for a variance request for a 0 foot step back," Brandy said.

Applicant representative Tony Neland told the board he represents the buyers, Bob and Brenda Becker, under a purchase agreement and that the seller, Alan Burns, had passed away. "Set to close July 7. And like I said, we're just trying to repair what's there," Neland said.

Board members discussed whether the replacement would enlarge the structure; staff and the applicant said the work is an exact replacement and that the proposal is the least-restrictive alternative because the porch and awning predate zoning. The board moved to approve the variance; a roll call recorded unanimous approval.

The meeting record shows the variance was approved as a relief for a legal nonconforming structure. No conditions beyond normal permit requirements were recorded during the hearing; the applicant will proceed with replacement as described and complete any required building-permit work.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee