Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Instructional Practices topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

High-school pilot using "Focus 4 + 1" formative-assessment framework shows early gains, principal says

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Assistant/teacher Casey McLaughlin described a short professional-development pilot at Sandpoint High School centered on a "Focus 4 + 1" framework that teachers reported increased formative-assessment use and coincided with higher math proficiency at the high school.

Assistant principal and instructional lead Casey McLaughlin reported to trustees on Aug. 12 about a professional-development pilot at Sandpoint High School aimed at increasing formative assessment in daily instruction. McLaughlin said the initiative used a framework he labeled "Focus 4 + 1" (four core lesson elements plus feedback) to help teachers integrate formative checks into everyday lessons. Over a six-week intervention teachers self-selected one area to emphasize, implemented strategies in class and collected self-assessment and observational feedback. Teachers interviewed after the pilot said they welcomed the approach because it was classroom-relevant and teacher-directed, McLaughlin said. He reported that teachers who targeted a range of lesson elements implemented more formative assessments overall and that administration-supported changes (for example, adding whiteboards in classrooms) helped adoption. McLaughlin noted the district—s math scores improved: he reported that overall mathematics proficiency at the high school rose above 50 percent during the period studied. He said this was preliminary and that causation could not be established from the pilot alone, but he argued the framework showed promise and recommended continued, chunked professional development and ongoing teacher self-assessment. Trustees praised the work and asked that the practice be sustained and embedded in walkthrough and feedback systems; staff said they are building observation tools tied to the Focus 4 + 1 framework for use in future instructional reviews. No formal action was taken; McLaughlin described next steps that include expanding training, lengthening implementation time and integrating the framework with building-level walkthrough tools.