Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews first reading of health curriculum policy after legislators added parent-notice requirements
Summary
Trustees reviewed a first reading of a revised health and human sexuality curriculum policy that incorporates language referencing Idaho Code 33-16-09, and discussed adding prefatory language and parent-notice procedures before final adoption.
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees reviewed a first reading of a revised policy on health instruction and human sexuality on Aug. 12 as state law changes require new parental-notice and opt-in procedures. Board members discussed a clause in the model policy that quotes the statute—s narrow definition language. The model language, drawn from Idaho Code 33-16-09, lists specific instructional topics the statute covers; board members said the statutory wording uses terms some in the community find objectionable, and asked whether the district should restate the text in the policy or link to the statute. Dr. Meyer and the drafting team said their attorney recommended including the statute—s language in the policy for clarity, but that the district could add a prefatory sentence explaining that the district does not intend to teach all listed items as curriculum unless explicitly described and approved in lesson plans or unless required by law. The board asked staff to return language before the next meeting clarifying what the district actually teaches and how parents can review content. Under the statute and the draft policy, instruction on human sexuality items requires advance parent notice with at least two weeks— notice, a brief content description or a linked lesson plan, and an opt-in permission form giving parents a choice. The draft permission form presented to the board would notify parents of the start date, provide brief content or a link, and require parents to return the form; if no permission is returned, the student would receive an alternate assignment. Trustees asked staff to clarify whether the district must include the statute—s precise wording in the policy, whether the parent permission form can be returned digitally, and how opt-outs apply to part-time or dual-enrolled students and to homeschool students participating in district activities. Staff said they would consult the district attorney and provide revised language and a procedure indicating what the district does and does not teach, and how parents will receive and return notices. The item was a first reading; no policy vote was taken.

