Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tribal Health Medicaid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tribal leaders urge managed‑care option for Medicaid to address health disparities
Summary
Tribal leaders and committee members discussed a tribal‑managed Medicaid model (capitated managed care) as a tool to improve behavioral health and chronic‑disease outcomes and to stabilize state budgeting; chairman and tribal leader described meetings with South Dakota and upcoming talks with state health officials.
Committee members and tribal leaders discussed shifting Medicaid services for tribal members to a tribe‑managed, capitated model to improve access to behavioral health and address social determinants of health.
"We've been engaged with South Dakota Department of Social Services on, taking a look at managed care," Chairman Renville told the committee, describing work that tribal leaders and South Dakota officials have done to explore a tribal‑run managed‑care arrangement. He said the goal is to "shift the focus from...a reactive model, which is more expensive," toward earlier intervention and better management of mental‑health and substance‑use disorders.
Renville said the tribes in North Dakota support the effort and that the model appears feasible for the state. He told the committee he has scheduled a meeting with Secretary Althoff on Aug. 28 and invited North Dakota counterparts to participate. In broad terms he described a "rule of thumb" capitation figure of about $1,000 per member per month and cited an informal population estimate of roughly 30,000 Native American Medicaid members in North Dakota as context for feasibility discussions. He also estimated a realistic negotiation and implementation timeline of about 18 months, with an expedited target of next summer.
Committee members and agency staff raised related workforce and telemedicine issues. Director Hawk of the governor's office said the governor’s workforce subcabinet is discussing housing and childcare as workforce bottlenecks and that the governor's office intends to stand up a tribal‑state relations subcabinet to address cross‑cutting issues including behavioral health.
Several lawmakers noted the potential budgetary effect of a capitated model: in a managed‑care arrangement some costs become federally matched and pre‑negotiated, which could reduce the state’s variable costs for care delivered in urban settings where Indian Health Service (IHS) facilities are absent. No formal action was taken; the chairman invited committee members to attend further meetings and to follow up with legislative staff and tribal leaders.
Why it matters: The discussion could lead to a significant administrative change in how Medicaid services are organized for enrolled tribal members. Proponents say a tribal‑managed, capitated model may improve care delivery, address social determinants of health and stabilize state budget exposure; opponents or fiscal analysts will need detailed modeling and formal agreements before any transition.
