Staff outlines guest-parking standard and rare use of parking reductions; commissioners ask for clearer trade-offs

5668658 · June 25, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City planning staff told the Planning and Zoning Commission June 24 that a guest-parking requirement of 0.3 spaces per unit was added to the zoning code after 2023 and that parking reductions remain an infrequent, project-specific exception.

Kelsey Shatnik, a city planner, presented a briefing June 24 on parking-reduction requests and the city’s updated guest-parking standards.

Shatnik said the zoning ordinance did not have a separate guest-parking requirement before 2023; staff added a guest-parking standard of 0.3 spaces per unit after council direction and analysis of recent multifamily projects. She explained how multifamily parking is calculated by bedroom count (studio/efficiency = 1.0 space; one-bedroom = 1.5; two-plus bedrooms = 2.0) and that guest parking is intended to address short-term visitor demand. Administrative reductions of up to 10% are possible if applicants provide technical evidence—such as empirical parking-demand studies—or if public parking within 100 feet can accommodate required spaces.

Shatnik told commissioners parking-reduction requests are infrequent (two formal requests in the past ten years) and are reviewed case-by-case. Commissioners asked staff to make the public record clearer when reductions are approved: identify what the community is “getting back” for fewer parking spaces—for example, on-site amenities, affordable units, or public benefits—and to include those trade-offs in staff reports so the public can evaluate the value of a concession.

Staff said each request is evaluated for context, such as on-street parking availability and neighborhood impacts, and that developers must provide technical evidence to justify a reduction. The commission did not act on any ordinance changes; the presentation was informational.