Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council gives staff consensus to advance three annexation petitions after initial review
Summary
City staff presented three annexation proposals — a roadway parcel to add to a multifamily site, a 39‑acre industrial PAD proposal near Peoria and Serval, and a 39‑acre mining parcel expected to convert to mixed use after extraction — and the council gave consensus to proceed to required blank‑petition public hearings.
City staff presented three annexation applications at the June 24 workshop and asked the Glendale City Council for consensus to advance each application to the blank‑petition public hearing required under the city's annexation policy.
Senior planners summarized each proposal and the initial fiscal analysis prepared by a third‑party consultant, Applied Economics. The three items were:
- 80th Avenue & Myrtle (AN‑270): A half‑acre strip of abandoned roadway in Maricopa County adjacent to an existing multifamily project was proposed for annexation so it could be incorporated into the previously annexed multifamily site. Staff said the county roadway abandonment preceded the annexation and that the annexation would align municipal zoning with the adjacent multifamily land use. Applied Economics estimated one‑time fees of roughly $880,000 and an annual net benefit to the city of about $3,000 for the combined development analysis; staff characterized the annexation as a technical step tied to the project to the south.
- Cereval/Peoria industrial proposal (AN‑269): A 39‑acre site south of the southwest corner of Peoria and Serval Avenues currently in county RU‑43 zoning was proposed for annexation and concurrent rezoning to a planned area development (PAD) to permit industrial uses. Staff noted surrounding properties to the north and west are in city municipal planned area development zones. Applied Economics' high‑level scenarios showed a positive net fiscal impact across the hypothetical blended industrial development cases; staff offered an illustrative one‑time fee figure of approximately $3,000,000 and an annual net benefit on the order of $200,000 under the consultant’s blended scenario. Council clarified that the conceptual site plan under PAD review showed building heights not exceeding 45 feet in the current conceptual submittal.
- 3 Rocks Mining Phase 2 (AN‑268): A 39‑acre parcel along the Agua Fria River was presented for short‑term mineral extraction (the applicant expects to mine aggregate for about ten years) with a planned long‑term reincorporation into mixed residential, commercial and industrial uses. Staff said the adjacent parcels had already been purchased for mining by the applicant and that the site would be accessed from service roads near El Mirage. Applied Economics estimated a long‑term blended benefit of roughly $26,000,000 in one‑time revenues and about $1,450,000 in annual net benefit to the city if the long‑term mixed‑use buildout occurs; staff noted the short‑term mining phase would produce only marginal net fiscal benefit in isolation.
For each item staff asked for council consensus to advance to the blank‑petition public hearing (a required step before a formal annexation vote). Council gave consensus for all three annexation proposals to proceed to the public hearing phase. Staff indicated that rezoning and PAD applications would follow annexation adoption and that staff would work with applicants on appropriate development standards during the rezoning process.
No annexation was formally adopted at the workshop. The items will return to the council at public hearings where council may vote to adopt or reject the annexations and concurrent rezoning requests.
