Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council authorizes topographic surveys for Little League and Swenson fields as first step in field replacement plan

5604157 · May 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended discussion about moving and improving ball fields, the council voted 4-2 on May 21 to authorize topographic surveys for the Little League complex on Nashua Road and the Swenson fields; the surveys (about $12,400 and $7,700) are intended to inform design, parking and permitting decisions for future field work.

The Bedford Town Council on May 21 authorized topographic surveying for both the Little League complex (Nashua Road) and the Swenson fields as an initial, strictly technical step toward a possible field-replacement and relocation plan.

The motion — moved by Councilor Michael Strand and seconded by Councilor Gayle Levesque — passed 4-2 after extended public and council discussion about safety concerns, parking, lighting, cost estimates and whether the town should re-submit a revised project to voters. Councilors debated the timing and scope of any design work and whether conducting an engineering study now is prudent without clearer public consensus.

Survey scope and cost: Staff reported the topographic survey proposals received from an engineering firm were roughly $12,400 for the Swenson parcel and $7,700 for the Little League parcel (Nashua Road). Town staff said the survey uses drone-based topography and will produce the base data needed to develop accurate cost estimates and conceptual designs.

Why it matters: Councilors said one critical driver is that the Little League fields sit on a capped landfill area where subsurface conditions complicate digging and long-term stability; councilors and staff said leaving the site unchanged carries increasing risk and could force closures if structural problems develop. Proponents argued that surveying is a modest, necessary step to determine whether fields can be safely raised and repurposed. Opponents said they would prefer a clearer public consensus before spending engineering funds and cautioned that a design could still fail to pass voters.

Other items discussed: Staff said Eversource and utility work may reduce some electrical-cost barriers for lighting at Jenkins Road/Swenson; councilors flagged parking constraints that could limit the number of usable simultaneous fields at Swenson; staff emphasized that a full design would add further detail about stormwater, utilities and permit requirements and that the survey is a relatively inexpensive, one-time information step that would be useful regardless of final use.

Vote and next steps: The vote to authorize surveying passed 4-2. The surveys are expected to produce design-level topography and will inform any future engineering and cost estimates the council or voters might be asked to authorize for construction or relocation. Staff said a full design would likely take until the fall and noted that a March ballot timeframe remains possible if the council directs staff to pursue design and funding in time for warrant deadlines.