Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Law Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jackson council passes ordinance banning masks in outdoor public spaces after expedited vote
Summary
The Jackson City Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of masks in outdoor public spaces and expedited the measure to take effect immediately; proponents cited public-safety and facial-recognition concerns while opponents during public comment raised constitutional questions.
The Jackson City Council voted 7-0 on Aug. 12 to adopt an ordinance prohibiting individuals from wearing masks in outdoor public spaces within city limits. Council members voted to suspend typical timing rules and moved the ordinance to final passage the same day.
Drew Martin, the city attorney, advised the council that, if no member objected, the item could be introduced and passed immediately. After a motion and second to expedite, the council approved the ordinance on a unanimous vote.
Supporters of immediate passage argued the ordinance helps law enforcement identify suspects and deter crimes committed with face coverings. Councilman Foote said the city has invested in surveillance and facial-recognition tools and that masks can be used to evade identification: “One of the important technologies that’s come about in the past several years … is the ability to identify people that may be breaking the law,” he told colleagues.
Members of the public and several speakers during the meeting warned about constitutional and civil-rights implications. In public comment, Zach Service urged caution and recommended state-level action instead of a local ban; he said the ordinance may conflict with state law and argued data presented in support of the rule did not show a local problem large enough to justify it.
The ordinance’s text defines the covered outdoor spaces and includes exemptions; the council approved the measure after a motion to expedite. The mayor and council directed the city attorney’s office to finalize the ordinance language and provide the certified text for the municipal code. No court challenges were filed during the meeting; council members noted legal questions but proceeded with the vote.
The ordinance is effective immediately under the council’s expedited action and will be enforced by city authorities according to the rules in the adopted code provision.
