Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Appointments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate committee endorses Chris Conaby for Alcoholic Beverage Services Commission

5593801 · August 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate Business, Labor and Confirmation Committee unanimously recommended Chris Conaby to the full Senate to fill a vacancy on the Alcoholic Beverage Services Commission. Supporters highlighted his real estate development and public-service background and emphasized commissioners' limited role to implement legislative policy.

Senator Evan Vickers, chair, introduced the nomination of Chris Conaby on Aug. 18 and invited Conaby to describe his background and interest in the Alcoholic Beverage Services Commission.

Conaby said his professional experience is in real estate development and hospitality and described prior public-service roles including managing director of corporate recruitment in Governor Herbert—s administration, service on the governor—s Office of Economic Development board, and local planning commissions. He told the committee he understands commissioners have limited latitude and saw the commission—s role as enforcing code, supporting staff and returning statutory questions to the Legislature.

Tiffany Clayson, former DABs executive director, endorsed Conaby, saying his business and hospitality experience will add useful perspective to the commission—s decisions on licensing and penalties. Conaby told the committee he sees the agency—s work as a balance between access and service on the one hand and public safety and preservation of community values on the other.

The committee voted to favorably recommend Conaby to the full Senate. Senator Musmar moved the motion; the committee recorded the recommendation as unanimous (6-0).

Discussion versus decision: committee discussion focused on Conaby—s accessibility to the public and his approach to communication and staff integration (discussion). The committee then took formal action to forward the nomination to the full Senate (decision).

Ending: Conaby thanked the committee and the meeting record shows the nomination will proceed to the full Senate for confirmation consideration.