Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Military Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission reviews Eielson AFB plan to replace 40,000 sq. ft. of damaged taxiway asphalt

5593743 · August 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Special Historic Preservation Commission reviewed a U.S. Air Force request to replace 40,000 square feet of fuel-damaged asphalt on Taxiway Kilo at Eielson Air Force Base; staff reported the State Historic Preservation Office concurred that the work will have no adverse effect and the commission offered no comment.

The Special Historic Preservation Commission on Aug. 13 reviewed a U.S. Air Force request to replace about 40,000 square feet of asphalt on Taxiway Kilo at the south end of the airfield at Eielson Air Force Base.

Staff said the replacement material will be concrete to reduce future fuel degradation and that the ground disturbance will be limited to the existing taxiway footprint, with excavation not expected to exceed 24 inches. "Taxiway Kilo is not historic and not within the Flight Line Historic District and is spatially removed from the runway," staff reported, and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) had concurred that the project would have no adverse effects.

The commission had no substantive questions and offered no comments for transmittal. Staff said they would convey any comments the commission asked them to raise with Eielson Air Force Base.

The item was informational: the project footprint is within previously constructed pavement, the proposed replacement will change surface material to concrete, and SHPO concurrence was reported. No formal recommendation or vote on conditions was recorded at the meeting.

Commissioners did not raise issues about the project’s potential to uncover archaeological resources; staff noted excavation depth and the restricted footprint as the basis for SHPO’s concurrence.

The commission moved on to other agenda items after the staff presentation; no additional follow-up was assigned beyond offering to transmit comments if commissioners requested them.