At the July 30 workshop, councilmembers discussed a presentation they and staff had received from a representative of the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar who observed the Grand Junction municipal court and raised concerns about courtroom access, the timing of appointed counsel and other procedural issues.

Councilmembers said the observer reported instances where people in municipal court lacked on‑the‑spot counsel at arraignment, courtroom access was limited if a person left during proceedings, and other practices raised transparency and parity questions between municipal and state court procedures. The presenter recommended improvements; councilmembers said the municipal judge and city staff were receptive to working on fixes.

City Attorney John Shaver told the council the city does use appointed counsel for indigent defendants and that applications for court‑appointed counsel are processed; he noted that some detainees with broader state-level holds can remain in custody for reasons unrelated to municipal case processing. Councilmembers said they wanted to ensure parity of process and that municipal punishments and procedures not differ unfairly across court venues.

Councilmembers asked staff to form a small group — including interested councilmembers, the municipal judge and the city attorney — to meet, review the outside observer’s presentation and prepare recommendations. The group will report back to council with suggested changes or a plan for further public discussion. No formal policy changes were adopted at the workshop.