Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Social Services Childcare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Longmont council taps contingency fund for infant childcare and community services
Summary
Council approved one-time contingency payments to two local nonprofits — $25,000 for TLC Learning Center to cover infant childcare vouchers and $15,000 for El Comité for operating support — after debate over precedent and available funds.
Longmont City Council approved two one-time allocations from the council contingency fund on Aug. 5, 2025, to help local nonprofits cover urgent operating shortfalls.
Mayor Pro Tem Susie Hidalgo Faring moved and Councilor Sean McCoy seconded a $25,000 allocation to TLC Learning Center to subsidize infant childcare while county Child Care Assistance Program funds remain on hold. The motion passed; the record shows the allocation approved following debate about how much the contingency fund should be used for community nonprofits.
Nut graf: Councilors described the request as time‑sensitive and tied to a county decision that paused CCAP vouchers for 2025. Council members debated precedent, typical annual contingency allocations and whether large one‑time awards would leave the fund too low to respond to other emergencies.
In discussion, Hidalgo Faring said the item was intended to “allow for a robust discussion and educational opportunity for the public,” and explained TLC’s ask — $75,000 through the end of the year — was larger than the council was likely to authorize from contingency. Councilor Rodriguez noted the council’s usual annual contingency allocation is about $60,000 and said awards above roughly $25,000 are unusual. Councilor Yarbrough supported $30,000; McCoy, Popkin and others favored $25,000 as a compromise. Council voted to approve $25,000 to TLC.
Shortly afterward, Hidalgo Faring moved to allocate $15,000 to El Comité for operating support through the end of 2025; that motion was seconded and also approved.
Council and staff clarified the financial impact: the contingency fund balance discussed during the meeting was $116,486 (rounded in discussion), and the two allocations leave the fund reduced by the approved amounts. Staff advised council that contingency dollars are one‑time general fund dollars and that enterprise funds are not available for these purposes. Councilors repeatedly cautioned against establishing an expectation that council contingency would be a recurrent substitute for county or grant funding.
Ending: Staff recorded the approved amounts and will process the one‑time grants. Several councilors asked staff to track any future similar requests so the council can consider a formal policy or criteria for contingency awards.
