Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Survey And Procedures topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners discuss survey, Daniels County procedures and missing training minutes; plan follow-up with consultant

5581441 · August 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Study Commission reviewed survey logistics and new-business material from Daniels County as a model, raised concerns about missing training minutes from a Dan Clark session, and agreed to assemble and circulate documents and questions before the next meeting.

Study Commission members discussed the groupsurvey, referenced Daniels County procedures as a model, and raised concerns about missing minutes and recordings from a prior Dan Clark training session they said took place for the town and county.

Commissioners said the prior training by Dan Clark (identified in materials as "MSU Dan Clark") had substantive discussion and that questions and answers from that session would be useful as the Study Commission develops its own questionnaire. "I think maybe we should... look into the exact minutes that we've taken corresponding agenda. Put the link up for Dan Clark discussion, and then we should watch it," one member said. Members agreed to contact Dan Clark with clarifying questions and to circulate any draft communications to the full commission.

Members repeatedly said they had difficulty locating minutes or recordings related to the training and requested staff check whether recordings and minutes were posted. Several members said the training and a related meeting had been open to the public and that recording files should therefore be available. Attendees noted that some people who attended the Dan Clark session took minutes and that someone had a recording, but the Study Commission could not find the materials on the town or county websites.

Survey and questionnaire: Members said prior survey drafts from earlier study efforts were too broad and lengthy and recommended shortening the questionnaire and using prior drafts as a template. One member proposed fitting key questions on a single page to improve response rates. Commissioners agreed to "do homework" before the next meeting to produce a pared-down draft to discuss and voted to table specific survey questions until the next meeting.

Ex officio role: Blanche clarified the ex officio role described to the commission: no voting power, assistance with logistics, communications, contacts to departments and officials, and coordination of records and resources.

Next steps: Staff and commissioners will (1) search for and share recordings or minutes from the Dan Clark session and other prior meetings; (2) circulate a draft short questionnaire to commissioners in advance of the next meeting; and (3) prepare a draft communication to Dan Clark with questions for clarification.