Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Logistics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Granite County study commissioners pick courthouse as preferred meeting site, set fallback to elections office
Summary
Members of the Granite County Study Commission agreed to ask the county commission to allow use of the commissionersoffice for future in-person meetings and designated the elections office as the alternate location if the request is denied; the panel also agreed to prefer Wednesday evenings for meetings.
With two members present, the Granite County Study Commission voted to ask the county commission to allow the Study Commission to hold in-person meetings in the commissionersoffice and to use the elections office as a fallback if that request is denied.
The motion was moved by Brian Sutton and seconded; the commissioners present voted in favor. "So I would make a motion to have Blanche present, the commission Office as our meeting location at the next commission meeting," Sutton said. After discussion about accessibility and remote capability, a second speaker amended the motion to add the elections office as the alternate. "And if not approved by the commission, use the Election Office as our official location," the amender said. The motion was seconded and the commissioners present responded "All in favor. I. I. Out of 2, if you add 3, then we've got 2. Unanimous."
Why it matters: Members said holding in-person meetings in a government space with Wi-Fi and remote capability would increase accessibility and attendance. Speakers raised concerns about library availability, stair access to the courtroom, and the need for remote (Zoom) hosting for people who travel. One member suggested Wednesday evenings at 6 p.m. to avoid conflicts with court and planning-board hearings that were cited as reasons Thursday was problematic.
Discussion and context: Commissioners discussed alternatives if the commissionersoffice cannot be used, including the elections office on the main floor (less stair-climbing) or a downstairs room that might be accessible by elevator. The topic was treated as continued business: commissioners agreed that Blanche would present the location request to the county commission and report back.
The transcript shows the commission proceeded with the location motion despite an acknowledged lack of the full three-member body; members characterized the gathering as a work session but nonetheless made and recorded the motion and vote.
Next steps: Blanche, identified in the meeting as the Study Commissionex officio, agreed to take the request to the county commission and to check on availability of the elections office and other accessible rooms. Commissioners said they will finalize meeting date and time (members expressed a preference for Wednesdays at 6 p.m.) at the next meeting when more members may be present.
Votes at a glance: Motion to request the commissionersoffice as Study Commission meeting location, with fallback to the elections office if denied — moved by Brian Sutton; second stated on the record; tally: yes 2, no 0, abstain 0, absent 1; outcome: approved by the members present.
