Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreation Background Checks Capital Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rutland board adopts youth background‑check policy for rec volunteers; third mower purchase tabled
Summary
The select board adopted a hiring and volunteer background-check policy for the recreation department and tabled a proposed $19,000 mower purchase after a lengthy capital‑planning discussion.
The Rutland Town Select Board voted Aug. 12 to adopt a background-check policy for the town recreation department covering adult employees and volunteer coaches, and then postponed a separate decision about buying a new mower after debate over fleet strategy and capital planning.
Why it matters: The background-check policy establishes consistent screening for adults who work with youth, aligning town practice with school forms and requiring fingerprint checks for volunteers; the mower purchase discussion highlighted trade-offs in equipment retention, maintenance costs and whether to trailer mowers between fields instead of keeping one machine permanently at Dewey Field.
Town Recreation Director Mike Rowe and committee members presented the policy and said it would apply to adult employees and volunteer coaches but not to referees or minors. Committee language allows the rec director to consider extenuating circumstances for disqualification after conviction. “We will have two forms that they will have to fill out, which are the same as what the school requires,” Rowe said, citing state forms and a fingerprint check process.
The select board voted to adopt the policy as presented; the motion carried 4‑0. Rowe said the town will use the state forms the school uses and that the rec committee recommended adoption.
The board then considered a John Deere tractor/zero‑turn purchase for the rec program. Several members pressed for a less expensive option: sell an older mower, use an existing trailer to transport machines between fields, and place proceeds into depreciation to smooth replacement cycles. “Instead of purchasing a third mower… think about selling the one we have over at center, purchase a trailer sufficient to move a mower,” a board member suggested, arguing that using two mowers and a trailer would cut maintenance and depreciation costs.
After extended discussion about maintenance, replacement intervals and the rec department’s current staffing, a motion to table the mower purchase was made and seconded; the board voted to table the purchase 4‑0 and asked staff and committee to revisit the town’s capital schedule and return at a later meeting.
Ending: The recreation background-check policy is now adopted and in effect. The mower purchase request will be revisited after the rec committee and staff produce a clearer capital replacement plan and size/cost comparisons; the item was scheduled for further review at the board’s next meeting.
