Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Human Services Shelter Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners pause contract with Northeast Georgia Bridal Shelter pending multi-county funding agreement
Summary
The Hart County Board of Commissioners declined to sign an updated contract with the Northeast Georgia Bridal Shelter on Aug. 12, 2025, and asked staff to pursue an intergovernmental agreement and clarify board representation and funding formulas before any county signature.
The Hart County Board of Commissioners on Aug. 12 paused approval of an updated contract with the Northeast Georgia Bridal Shelter and asked staff to pursue an intergovernmental agreement that would bind other participating jurisdictions to a shared funding formula.
The move came after several commissioners said Hart County should not be the only entity legally bound to pay for shelter services without clear commitments and representation from neighboring counties and municipalities.
Commissioners said they want a single contract or an intergovernmental agreement that would include signature pages for all participating jurisdictions and clarify a common funding formula before Hart County signs. They also said Hart County should have formal representation on the shelter’s board of directors if the county will be a major funder.
County staff advised that the draft contract had been updated and was included in the meeting packet. Commissioners expressed concern that some jurisdictions named in the draft—Bowersville, for example—do not currently contribute funding. One commissioner noted the county had previously funded construction of a new shelter building that, to the commissioner’s understanding, is still not open.
County staff said they could prepare a contract structure with a signature page for each participating entity and would research whether Franklin County and other named entities currently appoint board members or contribute funds. No contract signature or vote was taken; commissioners said they would not take action at the Aug. 12 meeting and asked staff to return with clarifying information.
Discussion points included whether the shelter should be the lead agency for coordinating funding, whether the entity is organized as a nonprofit (5-0-1c was mentioned), and how board seats should be allocated if Hart and Franklin counties are the largest funders. Several commissioners suggested a seven-member board with three members from each county and an additional rotating commissioner seat.
The board directed staff to check participation and representation for the shelter, verify legal status and bylaws, and return with options rather than approving the draft contract that night.
No motion to execute the contract was made; commissioners said they would revisit the matter after the requested information was provided.
