Court agrees to extend legislative monitoring contract only if governor calls another special session; vote 3-1

5580473 · August 7, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Court heard an update on the ongoing special session and voted 3-1 to continue the county's contract with legislative monitoring consultants if the governor calls another special session, citing ongoing bills with potential county impacts such as property tax adjustments and emergency-response measures.

Nueces County commissioners on Aug. 6 heard an update about the states special session and voted to keep the countys legislative monitoring contract in place only if the governor calls a subsequent special session. Consultants Patricia Shipton and Joel Romo briefed the court on a stop-start special session in Austin driven by a quorum break in the Texas House. "This special session has broken down into a standstill because of the quorum break," Shipton said, adding that the Houses handling of a redistricting bill created uncertainty and that only 13 days remained in the current 30-day special session. She said some bills, including an influential property-tax measure filed by House Ways and Means Chairman Morgan Meyer, are moving in the Senate but face delay in the House. Romo said county staff were monitoring emergency-response, flood, and communication-system bills and possible grant opportunities. Commissioners discussed potential impacts, especially a measure referred to as SB 9 that county staff estimated could cost Nueces County roughly $4 million if enacted. After discussion, a court member moved to continue the consultants' services at the current rate only if the governor calls another special session. The motion passed 3 ayes, 1 no. The court recorded concerns from members that the special session was unusually contentious and warned of continued legislative uncertainty; a commissioner called for letters to the state delegation if bills harmful to counties advanced. No amendments to the contract terms were made during the court session; the continuation is conditional on a gubernatorial call for a further special session.