Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Town‑facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bow select board weighs $300K–$500K repairs, phased fixes for municipal building and parking lot
Summary
Select board and Buildings & Facilities Committee reviewed engineering recommendations for drainage, ADA access and parking at the municipal building, agreed on near-term fixes and to preserve a CIP line for a multi‑year project.
Bow Select Board members and the Buildings and Facilities Committee on Aug. 12 discussed a multi‑part plan to repair the town’s municipal building exterior, address drainage and reconstruct the adjacent parking areas, with committee members estimating a full scope might cost roughly $300,000–$500,000.
The conversation focused on balancing immediate health-and‑safety fixes with longer‑range capital planning. Committee members and town staff recommended short-term measures — gutters, targeted foundation exposure and local drainage work — while keeping a larger reconstruction on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to be funded over several years.
Committee members summarized prior work: a building needs assessment by H.L. Turner, additional recommendations from DuBois & King, borings in the upper parking area and earlier appropriations of about $90,000. The committee said the most urgent problem is exterior drainage that is contributing to dampness in a corner of the basement and recurring ice formation on walkways in winter. One member said there is “a river of water” running between the asphalt and the building in some places and described recurring slips and a sprain caused by cracking in the lot surface.
Town staff and committee members agreed on three near-term steps: (1) get a professional survey to confirm parcel and easement boundaries for the south parking area, (2) install gutters and downspouts to cut roof runoff to the foundation and (3) obtain an integrated engineering scope that merges H.L. Turner’s and DuBois & King’s recommendations for grading, drainage and ADA access. The committee reported quotes for a lot survey in the $4,000–$6,000 range and said roughly $65,000 remains available from the prior appropriation to fund near-term work.
Board members discussed whether to pursue the full reconstruction now or phase work. Several members said the town should continue to save in the CIP for a multi‑year project while tackling low‑cost, preventive fixes in the operating budget. One select board member urged against “half‑million‑dollar” patchwork without confirming long‑term use of the building, while others said the building will still be in use for the next three to five years and that phased investments are reasonable.
The Buildings & Facilities Committee recommended closing the former front entrance and reconfiguring the south door (now the principal entrance) to meet ADA requirements if the project triggers code deadlines. Committee members also raised the idea of coordinating any parking changes with future plans for a community center and the playground replacement to preserve or recover parking spaces.
No formal motion or vote was taken in the work session. The board directed staff to obtain the survey, gather gutter installation quotes, merge engineering recommendations into a single scope for estimates, and keep a line item for the larger project in the CIP for multi‑year funding.
Less critical details: committee members noted that lowering the upper parking lot grade by a few feet might reduce needed retaining walls and improve drainage, but that lowering grade would also affect parking counts and ADA compliance. The committee urged pursuing the survey before committing large sums so taxpayers do not finance work on land under easement.
