Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Feasibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Site constraints, parking and air‑quality concerns raised for Finn site; Mooney Field protected by Chapter 97
Summary
A working‑group member reported a preliminary Finn site assessment that found constrained buildable area, limited parking, wetlands and a 7.23‑acre parcel (Mooney Field) with Chapter 97 protections; a committee member urged air‑quality testing because the school sits roughly 300 feet below a major highway.
A working‑group member presented a preliminary site review of the Finn property and nearby parcels on Aug. 12, highlighting land constraints, parking shortfalls for expanded enrollment, wetland areas and a nearby 7.23‑acre parcel known as Mooney Field that the presenter said has protections under Massachusetts Chapter 97.
The presenter said the Finn site includes filled land, limited parking, and recreation fields that would be affected by any substantial building addition. He said the 7.23‑acre parcel (Mooney Field) is effectively protected by Chapter 97 and would be difficult to convert to school use without state legislative action. He recommended consultation with town counsel and with the Board of Health on septic and with conservation staff before assuming the land is available for expansion.
The presenter also raised an air‑quality concern because the school is located approximately 300 feet below and adjacent to a heavily trafficked highway. He said literature and prior studies nationwide show proximity to major highways creates small‑particle exposure risks and recommended an air‑quality study if the committee continues to evaluate the Finn site. Committee members said they would request testing and enforcement of idling rules at pickup lines as mitigation if appropriate.
Committee staff confirmed that additional site‑specific analyses — wetlands delineation, septic capacity, parking capacity and square‑foot construction cost estimates — are part of the working group’s next steps and will feed the room‑by‑room mapping the school department will present to the school committee.
No decision was made on site selection; the presentation was preliminary factual reporting and flagged items for follow‑up.
