Board reviews late TSSA submissions from SkyView, Green Canyon and Spring Creek

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff reported three late Targeted Student Support and Academic (TSSA) plans from SkyView, Green Canyon and Spring Creek, describing primary focus areas such as PBIS, ELL support and class-size reduction.

District staff told the board on Aug. 7 that three TSSA plans were submitted late this year and summarized their focus areas. Nut Graf: The late submissions reflect internal staffing changes at the district office; principals sought extra time to ensure their plans were substantive. The district reported that SkyView's late plan emphasized academic, social-emotional and PBIS work and added ELL supports through its Bobcat Academy; Green Canyon focused mainly on class-size reduction with some PBIS supports and supplies; and Spring Creek's plan targeted RISE testing needs and PBIS supports. Staff said principals had workable reasons for late submission and noted a recurring rounding issue in the budgeting software that sometimes leaves budget totals off by $1, which principals typically correct before state submission. Board members discussed the $1 rounding discrepancy and the importance of timely state submission; staff said the small corrections are common and are handled administratively. Ending: Board members were asked to read the TSSA plans and be prepared to approve them at the next meeting; board members were encouraged to email principals if they have concerns.