Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vendor at public comment says RFP decision came down to a one‑tenth point margin; urges board to reconsider
Summary
At a school board meeting, Mike Bohm, national sales manager with Blooms, told the board during public comment that a district RFP for a five‑year school–home communications contract was effectively a tie — Parent Square edged Bloom's by 0.1 points, he said — and urged the board to choose the lower‑cost, higher‑functionality option.
At tonight’s school board meeting, Mike Bohm, national sales manager with Blooms, told the board during public comment that the district’s request for proposals for a five‑year unified school–home communication contract was decided by a “one tenth of a point” margin and urged officials to reconsider.
Bohm said the scoring difference was “one tenth of a point out of 120 possible points,” which he characterized as effectively a tie: “This was really a tie is what this was.” He said Bloom’s — which he represents — outperformed the selected vendor in objective categories and was lower cost, while the competing product, Parent Square, led in subjective demo scoring.
Why it matters: Bohm framed the decision as a fiscal and functional choice for a multi‑year contract. He told the board the district has “a fiduciary responsibility” to select the solution that offers better functionality at lower cost during a period of constrained funding.
Bohm summarized his claims about the procurement: that Bloom’s scored higher on objective criteria such as functionality and cost, that Parent Square scored higher on subjective demo impressions, and that Bloom’s offers features including “immersive translation into over 250 different languages and a positive behavior system built right into it.” He said Bloom’s could have the district “up and running in a very short amount of time” and asked the board to give Bloom’s “the first chance to be your partner.”
The remarks appeared during the open public‑comment portion of the meeting; the transcript contains no board response to Bohm’s statements in the excerpt provided.
Context and limits on the record: Bohm described committee scoring and procurement outcomes but did not present meeting minutes or an official vote record in his remarks. The transcript records his interpretation of the RFP scoring and product capabilities; those claims are attributed to him and are not confirmed here by district staff.
No formal motion or board action on the RFP was recorded in the transcript excerpt.
Ending: Bohm closed his three‑minute public comment by thanking the board: “I’d like to thank all of you for your time today.”
