Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pretrial Conditions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Judge orders drug-patch monitoring, restricts driving and directs treatment visits for defendants who test positive

5580246 · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Jefferson County judge ordered at least one defendant to obtain a drug-monitoring patch within 24 hours, barred her from driving while she tests positive, and instructed defendants to follow treatment plans and contact a local provider named in court.

The presiding judge ordered immediate treatment-related bond conditions for defendants who tested positive on drug screenings, including a requirement to obtain a monitored drug patch within 24 hours and follow a treatment plan. The judge told Precious Eaglin, charged with assault on a peace officer and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, “You are going to have to get a drug patch. You have 24 hours to get that. ... You have to get it changed every 2 weeks.” The judge also ordered that Eaglin not drive while she remains positive on testing. Why it matters: The court used bond conditions to require monitored treatment and to limit driving privileges pending negative tests — an immediate change to pretrial conditions that affects defendants’ mobility and treatment obligations. At the hearing the judge explained the expectations for treatment compliance and testing: “It’s obviously gonna test positive this first time, but it needs to test negative after that. Do you understand?” The judge directed the defendant to visit with court-recommended resources and to “do whatever you need to do” to follow the plan, specifically naming a local provider referenced in court as Spindle Top as a place defendants could obtain the patch and related services. The court also discussed patch testing results with counsel in other matters. In one case the judge noted a defendant, Brian Mitchell, had a hair-follicle test that tested negative and that the defendant had tested negative on a patch that day; the judge reiterated that defendants must continue to change patches on schedule and attend appointments. The court made these conditions part of bond compliance; failure to follow the testing and treatment plan could prompt the court to reexamine bond or other conditions at a future hearing. The orders were narrowly applied to the defendants who tested positive or whose testing protocols were under review; the judge directed them to meet with court staff and with defense counsel to make specific plans before leaving the courthouse.