Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District orders weapon-detection systems and plans security spending from state grant
Summary
District officials said weapon-detection equipment has been ordered, a single student entrance has been established and the board noted a public school security grant of about $26,000 allocated to Oneida will be used to address identified security deficits.
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District officials told the board that the district has ordered weapon-detection systems and has begun consolidating student entry points while it prepares to install new equipment.
Administrators said the district has already repurposed existing metal detectors to create a single controlled entrance at the middle and high school, with staff stationed to monitor the checkpoint while the new systems are installed. The district reported that the new detection systems will be installed as paperwork and procurement finalize.
The board was told that the public school security grant has reopened and that the district is allocated a little over $26,000 that must be spent on items identified in the district’s security assessment submitted to the state. District staff said they will review the assessment’s identified deficits and use the grant funding for those eligible items. Officials also said they have applied for a separate safety grant intended to fund door-lock upgrades and hoped to coordinate spending between the two grants but noted timing and program rules could limit how funds are combined.
District staff reported that the emergency operations plans have been completed with principal input and are pending state approval. The board was also informed that health- and safety-related efforts — including dental sealants provided by a children’s hospital for elementary and middle-school students — are being scheduled separately from the security equipment work.
No specific purchase orders or contractor names were recorded in the meeting minutes; the board approved procedural items related to procurement earlier in the agenda.

