Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ambulance Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cumberland staff seek flexibility to buy ambulance under RSAP grant; board presses for inspection and warranty safeguards
Summary
County staff said Cumberland received a $252,000 RSAP grant on a 70/30 match and presented quotes for road-ready ambulances that would require a $83,000to$155,000 local match depending on vehicle chosen. Supervisors pressed staff for inspection periods, warranty details and a timeline under which a unit must be delivered.
Get email alerts on the Ambulance Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff told the Board of Supervisors on Aug. 25 that Cumberland won a Rescue Squad Assistance Program (RSAP) grant of $252,000 for a Type 1 ambulance and is seeking authority to move quickly on procurement because available, road-ready units are limited. Staff said the grant requires a 70/30 match and that current vendor quotes range from $335,000 to $407,000, meaning the countywould need to cover a delta of roughly $83,000 to $155,000 when a purchase is made. Availability estimates for units on dealer lots ranged from five to 12 months; new builds were quoted at 24 to 30 months. Supervisors and staff repeatedly emphasized due diligence: board members asked for written warranty descriptions, a short acceptance/inspection period before final purchase, and assurances that demo or "lot" units would include full new-unit warranties. County staff said the demo-style units under consideration are brand-new chassis and boxes built with factory warranties, not fully used ambulances, and stated they would present warranty language and inspection procedures prior to final appropriation. Several supervisors discussed fleet planning and maintenance: staff recommended maintaining three in-service ambulances with a spare/rotation plan and flagged trade-offs between gasoline and diesel drivetrains for maintenance costs and local serviceability. Staff requested authorization for a not-to-exceed procurement range and said the board would be asked later to appropriate the difference between grant funds and the final purchase price. No final purchase authorization or appropriation was recorded at the meeting. Board members also suggested using a recent $59,024.77 timber-sale payment from the Commonwealth State Forest as a possible local match; staff said the timber-payment check is recorded as county revenue but did not state it had been formally earmarked for any purchase.

