Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medical Hardship Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Variance for 3515 W. Taikon approved after medical-need documentation and fire-safety review
Summary
A previously denied variance for a screen enclosure at 3515 West Taikon Street was approved after the applicant submitted medical documentation and an independent fire-safety inspection indicating the enclosure does not impede emergency access.
Get email alerts on the Medical Hardship Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Variance Review Board granted a variance to reduce the west-side corner-yard setback from 7 feet to 0 feet for an enclosed screen at 3515 West Taikon Street after the applicant provided medical documentation and an independent fire-safety inspection.
The petitioner’s representative, Steve Michelini, presented letters from medical providers stating the homeowner is immunosuppressed following a liver transplant and that special environmental protections should be used to reduce infection risk. The petitioner also provided a private inspection report by Jay Traina, a former city fire marshal and fire inspector, who concluded the enclosure did not impede fire department access or emergency egress. Transportation staff reviewed the site and signed off on no visual-triangle or driveway obstruction concerns.
Board members considered the hardship criteria and noted that the property is a corner lot with the front door and primary entry oriented toward Himes Avenue; the enclosure sits on an existing masonry wall and is buffered from the street by landscaping and an additional 20 feet of right-of-way. Letters of neighbor support were entered into the record.
Action: Board approved the variance for the screening enclosure as presented, finding that the documented medical hardship and the fire inspector’s report addressed previous concerns that led to a prior denial. The approval was conditioned on the standard permitting requirements and on maintaining emergency access as determined by fire and transportation reviewers.
Why it matters: The decision illustrates how documented medical hardship and independent fire-safety review can influence the board’s application of setback rules for a corner-lot entry feature.
Next steps: Applicant to secure any required building permits and to continue to comply with fire-safety and transportation conditions at permitting.

