Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Discipline Trends topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears rise in fights and threats; members flag cell‑phone policy as possible response

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District discipline data showed increases in fights and threats; board members and administrators discussed prevention strategies and whether a stricter cell‑phone policy could reduce incidents.

The Susquehanna Township School District’s discipline committee reported rising counts for several state‑reportable categories at the Aug. 4 meeting, prompting discussion about prevention programs and policies — including the possibility of a stricter cell‑phone rule. Assistant administrators presented three years of state‑reportable data used for the Department of Education safe‑schools report. The district noted that reported fights and disorderly conduct have increased compared with prior years; other categories such as possession of controlled substances and vaping were described as trending down or stable in the presented charts. “We will be discussing with our building administrators, to make sure that we are digging into the data and looking at some measures to bring those numbers down,” a discipline‑committee presenter said. The committee said future reports will include breakdowns by school and by demographics so the district can tailor interventions. Board members raised prevention and intervention strategies already in place, including programs listed in the district’s code of conduct and partnerships with outside providers. One board member asked if the schools have programs that teach students conflict‑management or social skills; the presenter said the district maintains a suite of interventions and will spotlight specific programs in future committee reports. Several board members and administrators discussed school electronic‑device policies as a possible tool. An administrator noted that districts that have restricted cell phones have seen declines in discipline incidents and suggested the board could adopt a no‑phone policy; a board member expressed concern about parents’ expectations to be able to contact children in an emergency. “If someone on the policy chair would like to reach out to one of the assistant principals at Harrisburg…they got a policy they put in with cell phone,” a board member said, referencing a neighboring district’s practice to secure phones during the day. Administrators agreed to work with parents, the policy committee and building leaders to explore options and to bring back data about programs and outcomes. They also agreed to provide more detailed, building‑level discipline data in future committee reports.