Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County board adopts first‑phase zoning ordinance corrections, clarifies animal units and dust control roles
Summary
The St. Louis County Board approved phase‑one amendments to zoning ordinance 62 to correct animal‑unit language, clarify dust control enforcement for extractive uses, adjust zoning map amendment timelines and align board‑of‑adjustment alternate membership with state statute.
St. Louis County commissioners on Aug. 12 voted to adopt a package of four first‑phase amendments to the county zoning ordinance (Ordinance No. 62), changes county planning staff and the planning commission said are intended to correct misinterpretations and align county rules with state law.
Director Ryan Logan told the board the amendments address specific problems of interpretation and procedure: a section on animal units included wording that could be read as allowing animal units per acre in a way not intended by the ordinance; extractive use standards were revised to clarify which agency enforces dust control; zoning map amendment procedural timelines were corrected (including a 20‑day timeline for notifications); and language on board‑of‑adjustment alternate membership was added to align with Minnesota statute. Logan said the work is a phase‑one step and the department and planning commission will continue comprehensive ordinance review in subsequent rounds.
Dust control clarification: Commissioners asked how the change affects on‑the‑ground enforcement of dust from borrow pits on unpaved roads. Logan and planning staff explained the amendment clarifies that planning and zoning enforce dust control within a permitted borrow‑pit area, while Saint Louis County Public Works retains responsibility for maintenance and dust control on county public roads outside permitted areas, with operators expected to coordinate with public works. Logan said the change reflects long‑standing practice and reduces ambiguity about departmental responsibilities.
Animal units and other fixes: The animal‑unit change removes ambiguous “per acre” phrasing so allowed animal units are interpreted consistent with the ordinance’s tables and acreage ranges, preventing potential exponential miscalculations. The zoning map and BOA language amendments correct procedural omissions and add the ability for the board to appoint alternate BOA members as provided in state statute.
Vote and next steps: The planning commission conducted a public hearing and recommended adoption; the county board approved the phase‑one amendments unanimously. Staff told commissioners the department is conducting monthly workshops to work through the ordinance section by section and expects additional amendments to return for board consideration in late 2025 or early 2026.
