Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bedford County supervisors vote to lease landfill loader after heated cost debate
Summary
After extended discussion comparing outright purchase and a four-year lease, the Bedford County Board of Supervisors voted to lease a rubber-tire loader for the landfill, citing downtime risk, maintenance coverage and permit requirements.
Bedford County supervisors voted to lease a rubber-tire loader for the county landfill after a lengthy debate that weighed immediate purchase savings against operational risk and warranty coverage.
The public works committee presented the board options and recommended leasing the loader rather than buying it. The committee member said the county’s current loader “has over 10,000 hours on it” and maintenance and rental costs from repeated breakdowns had exceeded $100,000 in recent years. The presenter told the board a lease would include preventive maintenance and warranty coverage and would provide replacement equipment at no cost if the machine failed during the lease term.
The debate focused on comparative costs. One supervisor said the purchase price in the packet was $349,019 and that the lease payments over four years appeared to total about $359,160, with a residual purchase option of roughly $123,890 that would make the lease-plus-buy total about $483,050. He said, “Unless I’m not understanding the numbers, it seems to me we save roughly $130,000 if we just buy it.” The public works presenter and others replied the packet’s figures should be read alongside maintenance and rental exposure for owned equipment and that the lease’s maintenance and rental-replacement provisions could reduce downtime costs and staffing impacts.
Board members also discussed practical issues such as tire replacement (noted as a major expense), the county’s practice of using GovDeals to sell surplus equipment, and the permit requirement that the landfill have a minimum number of working pieces of equipment on site under the county’s IDQ permit. The presenter said that if a county-owned loader were out of service, the county would need to rent a replacement “within 24 hours” to meet permit conditions.
After an initial motion to purchase the loader failed on roll call, the board approved a motion to lease the machine. The motion to lease was made by Ms. Parker and seconded by Ms. Tuck; the board approved the lease with a majority vote and Chair Bose casting a deciding affirmative vote.
The board directed staff to execute the four-year lease consistent with the terms presented and to continue monitoring equipment costs and downtime.
The lease decision closes a months-long discussion that began in the public works committee and was placed on the full board’s agenda for action.
