Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Experts and residents square off over proposals for permanent standard time or year‑round daylight time

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee heard competing testimony on two bills: H.3405, backing permanent Eastern Standard Time, and S.2157, seeking permanent daylight saving (Atlantic) time; sleep experts and safety advocates favored permanent standard time, while some business and tourism witnesses supported permanent daylight saving time.

The Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight heard sharply different views on two time‑policy bills: H.3405, which would support permanent Eastern Standard Time (often described in testimony as “permanent standard time”), and S.2157, which would establish year‑round daylight saving time (referred to in testimony as Atlantic or permanent daylight time).

Dr. Karen Johnson, a neurologist and sleep medicine specialist representing the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, urged adoption of permanent standard time and opposed permanent daylight saving time. “Permanent daylight saving time would delay sunrises in Massachusetts after 8 a.m. for about two months in winter,” she…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans