Industry and civil‑liberties groups back ban on weaponized robots; committee hears stadium, event safety concerns

Industry representatives including Boston Dynamics and the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International told the committee they support the Responsible Robotics Act, which would ban operation or sale of robots and drones mounted with weapons and set limited exceptions. Kelly Peterson, assistant general counsel at Boston Dynamics, described the Massachusetts robotics cluster and said the bill “prohibits the manufacturer, sale, use, or operation of a robotics device or drone that is mounted with [a] weapon,” while containing appropriate exceptions. She said the legislation responds to real global examples of weaponized commercial devices and would help protect public safety and industry reputation. Senator Jo Comerford and Senator Rebecca Rausch (testimony from Senator Barbara L’afonte was not present at this hearing) were among sponsors and supporters in the hearing, and Senator Cindy Creem referenced national guidance from DHS about hostile actors adapting off‑the‑shelf parts. Thomas Ryden of MassRobotics said Massachusetts “has one of the largest clusters of robotics companies anywhere in the world” and called the bill a way for the state to lead on responsible policy. Senator Patsy Moore underscored the public‑safety risk for stadiums and large events, calling out easy availability of add‑on holders and modules that can change a drone’s function. Grant Baker of AUVSI recommended the bill as a calibrated measure that protects public safety and public trust while allowing legitimate commercial and research uses. The committee accepted the testimony and will accept written follow up. Supporters said the measure strikes a balance between promoting innovation and protecting public safety.