Nominee Linda Blanchard says Rome UN food agencies need reform while protecting U.S. farmers
July 09, 2025 | Foreign Relations: Senate Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Linda Blanchard, President Trump's nominee to represent the United States to the UN food and agriculture agencies in Rome, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that she would prioritize efficiency and accountability in the Rome‑based agencies while protecting American farmers and food‑security outcomes if confirmed.
Blanchard said the Rome agencies "directly affect U.S. farmers and producers as billions of dollars of American agriculture exports move through their programs," and that the United States must ensure that UN organizations the U.S. engages with are "efficient and effective stewards of U.S. taxpayer dollars." She repeated Secretary Rubio's three‑question framework: "Does it make America safer? Does it make America stronger? Does it make America more prosperous?"
Senators pressed Blanchard on the human consequences of any funding reductions. Lawmakers described recent and projected cuts to international food programs and asked how the U.S. should balance fiscal scrutiny with humanitarian need. Blanchard said she supports closer partnership with U.S. farmers and with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and highlighted public–private partnerships as a possible avenue to preserve impact while improving oversight.
Committee members also discussed the leadership of FAO and the upcoming 2027 director‑general election. Senators asked whether the United States would work with allies to present a competitive candidate to ensure management aligned with U.S. interests. Blanchard said she plans to build alliances at post and work with partners to identify and support candidates who can win and lead effectively.
Blanchard cited her prior diplomatic experience in Slovenia and her nonprofit work addressing hunger and agriculture. She described food security as a life‑or‑death issue for hundreds of millions worldwide and said the mission of the Rome agencies matters both for humanitarian outcomes and for U.S. export interests.
The hearing included no committee vote; senators left the record open for additional written questions.
Blanchard said the Rome agencies "directly affect U.S. farmers and producers as billions of dollars of American agriculture exports move through their programs," and that the United States must ensure that UN organizations the U.S. engages with are "efficient and effective stewards of U.S. taxpayer dollars." She repeated Secretary Rubio's three‑question framework: "Does it make America safer? Does it make America stronger? Does it make America more prosperous?"
Senators pressed Blanchard on the human consequences of any funding reductions. Lawmakers described recent and projected cuts to international food programs and asked how the U.S. should balance fiscal scrutiny with humanitarian need. Blanchard said she supports closer partnership with U.S. farmers and with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and highlighted public–private partnerships as a possible avenue to preserve impact while improving oversight.
Committee members also discussed the leadership of FAO and the upcoming 2027 director‑general election. Senators asked whether the United States would work with allies to present a competitive candidate to ensure management aligned with U.S. interests. Blanchard said she plans to build alliances at post and work with partners to identify and support candidates who can win and lead effectively.
Blanchard cited her prior diplomatic experience in Slovenia and her nonprofit work addressing hunger and agriculture. She described food security as a life‑or‑death issue for hundreds of millions worldwide and said the mission of the Rome agencies matters both for humanitarian outcomes and for U.S. export interests.
The hearing included no committee vote; senators left the record open for additional written questions.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
