Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate debates statewide "bell-to-bell" cellphone ban for K–12; bill ordered to third reading
Summary
Senate debate centered on Senate Bill 2561 (an act to promote student learning and mental health), which would require districts to adopt 'bell-to-bell' policies restricting student cell phones during the school day; the bill was ordered to a third reading and senators requested a roll-call vote on enactment.
Senators debated a bill that would require every public school district in the Commonwealth to adopt a policy restricting possession and use of student cell phones and other personal electronic devices for the entire school day.
Sponsor Senator Lewis opened debate: “I am very pleased, to rise today in support of an act to promote student learning and mental health, which would make all of our public schools in the Commonwealth cell phone free,” Lewis said, framing the measure as addressing academic performance, student social skills, mental health and safety.
Nut graf: The bill directs the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to issue guidance and a model policy within 180 days of enactment and requires districts to implement a policy in time for the 2026–27 school year. The bill lists three explicit exceptions: devices required in a student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) or 504 plan, documented medical need, and students leaving campus for valid educational reasons (for example, early college or internships).
Debate and arguments: Senators who spoke in favor described research and anecdotal evidence linking phone use in schools to reduced academic performance, worsened mental health and classroom distractions. Senator Cyr and others said the proposal is evidence-based and bipartisan; Senator from Westfield described panels and district experiences where schools reported fewer fights and improved engagement after stricter restrictions. Supporters repeatedly cited teacher surveys and national studies used during committee work.
Concerns and implementation details: Supporters and some skeptics agreed that DESE should provide guidance and a model policy. Senator Kenney emphasized local control, noting the bill sets a state standard but allows districts to tailor policies and exceptions. Senators said schools must provide methods for parents and guardians to reach students during the day and that DESE may include additional narrowly tailored exceptions after public input. DESE’s guidance and the district implementation timeline (model policy within 180 days; district policy for start of 2026–27) were stated on the floor.
Formal action recorded: The Senate moved the bill to third reading and the sponsor asked for a roll-call (yeas and nays) when a vote is taken. The transcript records the order to third reading and the request for a roll-call; a final enactment vote was not recorded in the provided transcript.
Ending: Senators stressed the bill’s intent to recover classroom time and support educators while preserving narrowly defined exceptions for students with documented needs.
