Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Update Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff seeks board direction on code updates; appeals, wetlands delineation and wildfire rules top the list
Summary
Planning staff told the commission they are preparing a work program for the Board of County Commissioners to guide a targeted update of the county’s Land Development Code (LDC), and asked the commission to prioritize procedural and technical changes.
Planning staff told the commission they are preparing a work program for the Board of County Commissioners to guide a targeted update of the county’s Land Development Code (LDC). Staff asked the commission for priorities and flagged several matters intended for early review: appeals and reconsideration procedures, wetlands delineation requirements, wildfire hazard overlay rules, setbacks and definitions, and family land division language.
Why it matters: County code changes shape how applicants, neighbors and staff interact during permitting. Clearer appeals and reconsideration procedures and tighter definitions could reduce repetitive filings, clarify notice and public‑hearing expectations, and align county procedures with state law.
Key issues staff identified - Appeals and reconsideration procedures: Staff said the LDC currently conflates reconsideration and appeals and leaves uncertainty about whether an appeal is a de novo hearing or limited to the record. Commissioners and staff agreed more precise language is needed to define the processes and limit repeated filings.
- Wetland delineation: Staff noted the Army Corps of Engineers is increasingly unavailable for delineations and recommended relying on delineations prepared under Army Corps guidelines rather than requiring Corps signoff for every case. The commission discussed the difficulty of irrigation‑induced wetlands versus natural wetlands and potential options for verification.
- Wildfire hazard overlay: Staff said the wildfire hazard overlay language was unclear in some scenarios and recommended tightening standards that trigger defensible‑space requirements and associated building code responses.
- Setback definitions and administrative discretion: Commissioners raised examples where it was unclear whether a site feature was a front, side or rear setback and suggested clearer definitions or stronger administrator discretion for routine determinations to avoid unnecessary variances.
- Family land division / replatting provisions: The board expressed interest in whether family divisions or similar tools could be adopted; staff said jurisdictions such as Jackson and Teton County (WY) provide models to review.
Next steps Staff will present a targeted work program to the Board of County Commissioners and ask commissioners which items should be prioritized. The commission said it wants clearer notice and an opportunity for public input if broad code changes move forward.
