Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Veterans Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Veterans service office seeks expanded assistant hours; supervisors recommend two full-time staff
Summary
HHS and veterans-service supervisors presented options to expand the county veteran service office assistant from 20 hours up to full-time; supervisors said neighboring counties commonly have two full-time staff and argued the office's workload, especially mental-health and housing work, supports at least a 24-hour/week assistant.
Get email alerts on the Veterans Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HHS managers told the Pine County Board of Commissioners the county veteran service office (VSO) is operating with 1.5 full-time equivalents after a recent vacancy and asked the board to consider expanding the assistant county veteran service officer hours.
Becky and supervisor Barb Schmidt described a vacancy in the halftime assistant position and presented incremental options: keep the halftime position at 20 hours (baseline increase about $7,700 in the VSO budget), increase to 24 hours (an estimated $16,000 additional), or expand further to 28'32 hours per week; the larger step (30+ hours) would trigger prorated health benefits and larger budget increases. Becky and Barb said single-coverage health assumptions were used in cost estimates and that costs change if a new hire selects family coverage.
Barb and Becky argued that regional practice and demand support more staffing: several neighboring counties have two full-time VSO staff, and local outreach and mental-health, housing and transportation demands have increased. They recommended at minimum expanding the assistant to 24 hours per week to provide three-day coverage and reduce service gaps when the principal VSO is in Pine City or on outreach.
Ending: Supervisors asked the board to weigh the incremental options; they noted that increasing to 24 hours would be a relatively modest budget change with immediate operational benefit, while a full second FTE would be preferable if the board chooses to fund it.

