Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Socorro planning panel approves Avila subdivision plat but keeps Ernest Road easement
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a preliminary and final plat for the Avila Subdivision (4.71 acres) and granted waivers for a stormwater drainage plan and soils analysis, but declined to waive a required easement for the future extension of Ernest Road.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Socorro Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday approved a preliminary and final plat for the Avila Subdivision at 11599 S. Coral Road while denying a requested waiver that would have removed a future easement for the extension of Ernest Road. The commission voted to allow waivers for the stormwater drainage plan and soils-analysis requirements but required engineering-review comments be satisfied before the plat can be recorded.
The commission’s planner described the item as “the preliminary plat final plat and variance request” for a 4.71-acre property owned by Jose E. Avila. Planning staff recommended approval of the plat and recommended waivers for the stormwater drainage plan and soils-analysis requirements but opposed waiving the easement requirement for Ernest Road. The applicant’s representative, Ethel Bettencourt, and engineer Miguel Morales of Ray Engineering attended and answered questions.
The Avila property is zoned partly A-1 (agricultural) and partly R-1 (single-family residential). The proposal divides the single 4.71-acre parcel into two lots: Lot 1 with access onto Socorro Road and Lot 2 with access from Ernest Road. The applicant said Lot 2 is intended for the applicant’s daughter to build a residence at a later time.
Commissioners and staff discussed the practical effects of granting an easement waiver. Commissioner Enrique Cisneros raised the concern that “if we waive the approval for the, for the easement, the city won't have access to that in the future,” noting the city’s long-term connectivity plans for that area. The commission’s discussion emphasized that approving an easement now preserves a future right-of-way for city roads; denying or removing it could prevent future connections if adjacent parcels never dedicate matching easements.
Applicant representatives said detailed construction materials — such as soils tests and site-specific drainage plans — are typically submitted with a building permit rather than at the subdivision stage. Engineer Miguel Morales told commissioners, “The reason it's not in there, it's not necessary for us right now. When, we submit for a permit for the house, then that's when all that comes in.” Planning staff and commissioners noted that, even if the commission grants waivers at the subdivision stage, required technical reports and permits will still be required at later development stages.
The commission voted on a motion to approve the preliminary and final plat and to grant waivers for the stormwater drainage plan and soils-analysis requirements but to deny the applicant’s request to waive the Ernest Road easement requirement. The motion was made by Commissioner Andrew Arroyo and seconded by Commissioner Enrique Cisneros; the motion carried. The commission recessed into an executive session earlier in the meeting and later returned to regular session before the vote; no executive-session details were disclosed in the public record.
Next steps: the applicant may proceed toward recording the plat only after required engineering-review comments are addressed. When the owner or future builder seeks a building permit, the city will require soils reports, finished-floor elevations and any drainage measures necessary to protect the proposed homes and neighboring properties.

