Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals court hears challenge to Justin Rivers’ aggravated-child-neglect conviction over timeliness and sufficiency of evidence
Summary
At oral argument before the Fourth Camilla Appeals panel, defense and state lawyers disputed whether a late motion for new trial and notice of appeal should bar review and whether evidence was legally sufficient to prove aggravated child neglect.
A panel of the Fourth Camilla Appeals Court heard oral argument in the appeal of Justin Rivers, convicted of aggravated child neglect after an incident in which a 1-year-old, identified in the record as K.A., was found unresponsive and later treated by emergency medical services. Defense appellate lawyer Jessica Butler told the court the motion for new trial was filed "32 days after the judgments were filed, so 2 days late," and asked the panel to waive untimeliness in the interests of justice so the court could review sufficiency claims. Ronald Coleman, arguing for the State, said the motion and notice of appeal were untimely and that the court should dismiss the appeal or, if it reaches the merits, affirm because the evidence was sufficient.
The case matters because Rivers was convicted of a class A felony and is serving a 15-year sentence with no release; the stakes, the defense said, support allowing review despite the late filing. Butler argued the central appellate issues are sufficiency claims that can be reviewed on the merits even if the motion for new trial and notice of appeal were…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

