Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cell Phone Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Director backs tighter cell-phone rules, says district will study a ban

5535308 · August 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The director of schools said the district's current phone policy meets state requirements but signaled support for a stricter ban, citing early data on classroom impacts and other districts' experiences.

Dr. Lamers, the district’s director of schools, told the committee on Aug. 4 that he supports tightening the district’s cell-phone policy and is considering a more stringent ban that would take time to implement. "I'm actually a 100% in favor of us just banning cell phones," Lamers said, citing research and an example from another district that implemented a ban and later reported lowered discipline incidents. He also said the district’s current policy complies with state requirements but that a ban with enforceable measures would probably require about a year to implement. "I think you'll see a tightening up of that. I think before we can do a total ban, we're gonna need to spend a year probably," he told committee members. Lamers acknowledged managerial and parental concerns about safety and access to parents: "Some parents have legitimate concerns about safety," he said, and noted that the district must weigh logistics, exceptions and methods for enforcement. A committee member and a teacher in the room also described mixed views from students and families — including students who rely on phones for jobs or employer communications — and emphasized the need to test policies with parents and staff before adopting stronger rules. Discussion versus decision: the transcript records discussion and intent to revisit the policy; no formal motion or policy change was adopted at the meeting. Next steps: Lamers said he expects the district to “tighten up” policy language and to spend roughly a year preparing for any enforceable ban; the committee did not set a formal timeline or vote at this meeting.