Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flooding Mitigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners report life‑safety flooding on Martin Lane; planning and state agencies to study mitigation
Summary
Commissioners described a severe, recurring flood and roadway washout on Martin Lane in Cottontown, reported that Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and county planning have surveyed the area, and said planning funds exist to scope mitigation and possible acquisition of properties in the creek channel.
Get email alerts on the Flooding Mitigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The General Operations Committee received an update on recurring, life‑safety flooding on Martin Lane in the Cottontown area and on local steps toward mitigation. Commissioners described a washed‑out culvert that allowed water to flow over the road and down the bank, forcing a swift‑water rescue in recent storms and prompting immediate repair of the roadway.
Commissioners said Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) and county planning staff inspected the site and agreed the flooding was caused, in part, by structures and debris located in the creek channel. "TDEC specifically, they all understood and agreed that something needs to be done," a commissioner said. County crews installed riprap and other temporary repairs; the affected homeowner told committee members he was satisfied with the county's emergency repairs.
Committee members said there is already planning money allocated to scope a flood mitigation plan that could include property acquisition for sites built within the creek channel. Staff said a FEMA flood study has not previously been performed for the immediate neighborhood; planning staff and commissioners discussed initiating a formal study to determine if buyouts or other longer‑term mitigation would be appropriate.
Why it matters: committee members said the flooding is not isolated, has produced life‑safety rescues, and may worsen with development uphill. The committee reiterated the need to move from emergency repairs to a mitigation plan that identifies structural fixes, potential acquisitions and funding sources.
Next steps: planning staff will pursue a flood study and draft mitigation options; commissioners asked staff to return with scope and funding options for mitigation and potential property acquisitions.

